Yet the book’s strengths are also its liabilities. The relentless intensity can become numbing; its approach risks fetishizing trauma rather than illuminating it. Readers seeking plot-driven cohesion or moral clarity will find little sanctuary. The linguistic experimentation, while often dazzling, sometimes slips into opacity—provoking admiration and bewilderment in equal measure. These tensions are not flaws to be fixed but features of Santacroce’s aesthetic: she invites complicity and critique at once.